<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7983094871003871481</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>the classical atom</title><description>This blog is about a novel model of the elementary particles making the atom. Despite the simplicity and classical nature of the model, it predicts one single value for the elementary charge which can be approximately calculated! And there is no need for any &lt;i&gt;ad hoc&lt;/i&gt; nuclear forces to explain the atomic structure...</description><link>http://classicalatom.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>simpleparticle@gmail.com (Rebel)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7983094871003871481.post-3061167700401941144</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-26T18:12:32.058Z</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>elementary particles</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gravitation</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mass</category><title>Mass and gravitation</title><atom:summary type='text'>The model of the elementary particles presented in the first post makes it tempting to philosophize over the nature of mass and gravitation. Is there a logical concept of these matters that smoothly fits in? I have made an attempt to find one...Obviously, a clue must be that the mass of at particle is proportional to its total energy. Assuming that electromagnetic waves travel in a background </atom:summary><link>http://classicalatom.blogspot.com/2009/01/mass-and-gravitation.html</link><author>simpleparticle@gmail.com (Rebel)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7983094871003871481.post-5534422148107491179</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-19T20:01:10.679+01:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>classical model</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>elementary charge</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>elecromagnetic waves</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>particle physics</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>atomic structure</category><title>A simple model of electrons, protons, neutrons and their antiparticles</title><atom:summary type='text'>© 2008AbstractA strictly classical model of electrons, protons, neutrons and their antiparticles is presented. The model explains mass, spin and charge for each particle. An approximation of the value of the elementary charge can be calculated, and is found to be 0.956 times that of the measured value. Further, the model strongly suggests why neutrons can be unstable. A structure of the atomic </atom:summary><link>http://classicalatom.blogspot.com/2008/09/simple-model-of-electrons-protons.html</link><author>simpleparticle@gmail.com (Rebel)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SIkuuLM39fQ/SMPYgVl_EOI/AAAAAAAAAAM/tTs4qW6Jk-o/s72-c/int1.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item></channel></rss>